Jan 30, 2018 - Running time 171 minutes Country United States Language English Budget $7.6 million Box office $21 million Quo Vadis (Latin for ' Where are. Quo Vadis (1951) on IMDb: Taglines from original posters and video/DVD covers. Awkwafina Nears Deal to Join Dwayne Johnson and Kevin Hart in ‘Jumanji’ Sequel 8 hours ago| The Wrap 'Aquaman' Ready to Threepeat Over First Weekend in 2019. [Quo Vadis] THIS IS THE BIG ONE! The splendor and savagery of the world's wickedest empire!
Quotes: in his dying letter to Nero To Nero, Emperor of Rome, Master of the World, Divine Pontiff. I know that my death will be a disappointment to you, since you wished to render me this service yourself.
To be born in your reign is a miscalculation; but to die in it is a joy. I can forgive you for murdering your wife and your mother, for burning our beloved Rome, for befouling our fair country with the stench of your crimes. But one thing I cannot forgive - the boredom of having to listen to your. It is a great pleasure to see so many comments here that are enthusiastic about 'Quo Vadis'.
I just saw it again last night after about 15 years, and I marvelled at what a high quality spectacle it is - better than ever, in fact. In his autobiography, 'Take One', Mervyn LeRoy has some great stories about 'Quo Vadis'. Such as: while filming one of the really big crowd scenes, a voice pipes up from the extras: 'Hey Moy-vin!' , and it's Jack Benny.
And in a scene right out of one of his pictures, when 'Quo Vadis' is screened in San Francisco, and LeRoy is present, the theatre happens to be right near the corner where the big-time director once sold papers as a kid. He revisits the corner after the screening and sheds a few tears. LeRoy was an extra in C.B. DeMille's first 'Ten Commandments', so the desire to deliver something DeMillian was realized at last, and with smashing success. We all agree on Peter Ustinov's ingenious performance, so all I need to add is that in his own autobiography, 'Dear Me', Sir Peter's recollections of the filming are as wonderful as his performance.
Whatever his capabilities as an actor, I always thought that Bob Taylor's performance was pretty darn good, and appropriate, too: what high-ranking Roman officer wouldn't be pompous? In any case, the story is much larger than Marcus' character, and the story comes to dominate the picture. It is indeed a pity that the excellent Rozsa score wasn't handled by the Warners sound department, where it would have been been presented to full effect Much of its impact is squandered by its being kept in the background. I don't think Merv LeRoy had so much to do with this decision, as his alma mater was Warners (try watching 'Anthony Adverse'!) It seems that it was probably MGM policy. With sensitivity, a DVD version could perhaps offer the picture with a 'sweetened' soundtrack. The quality of the camera work by solid professionals Bob Surtees (later MGM's UltraPanavision 70 specialist) and Wm V.
Skall (his work on 'The Silver Chalice' was outstanding) really cannot be overstated. Along with the delights of Sir Peter's performance, I still get choked up when noble Buddy Baer takes on that bull, and when Marina Berti's character displays so much love and devotion to Leo Genn's. Genn is right up there with James Mason in quality, and indeed, Mason may have taken a few pointers from Genn's performance for his own acting in subsequent epics. Patricia Laffan is decadently sexy without being campy.
Trivia: scenes for the burning of Rome were sensibly used in MGM's 'The 7 Faces of Dr. Lao' and 'Atlantis, The Lost Continent' to great effect. It is a credit to Merv LeRoy for allowing great actors like Peter Ustinov and Leo Genn to 'do their thing'. 'Quo Vadis' is a classic: a stunning spectacle, intelligent, good script, fine performances by practically everybody, and it remains long in the memory, and holds up well indeed.
. All countries. United States. United Kingdom.
Canada. Australia. Germany. France. Spain. Italy.
Argentina. Austria. Belgium. Brazil. Bulgaria.
Chile. China. Colombia. Czech Republic. Denmark.
Finland. Greece. Holland. Hong Kong. Hungary.
Iceland. Indonesia. Ireland.
Israel. India. Japan. Malaysia. Mexico.
New Zealand. Norway. Philippines.
Poland. Portugal. Romania. Russia. Singapore.
South Africa. South Korea. Sweden. Switzerland.
Taiwan. Thailand. Turkey. Ukraine. United Arab Emirates. Quo Vadis Blu-ray Review A sweeping Hollywood epic that falls flat.
Reviewed by, March 16, 2009 Based on the 1895 novel of the same name by Nobel Prize-winning novelist Henryk Sienkiewicz, inspired by an apocryphal account of an exchange between St. Peter and a post-ascended Christ, and nominated for eight 1951 Academy Awards (including Best Picture, Cinematography, and Music), Quo Vadis is the epitome of early Hollywood spectacle. Of course, MGM (who earned a reputation for helming such lavish films) and director Mervyn LeRoy ( Little Caesar, Gypsy, and Random Harvest, just to name a few) spared no expense to bring their vision of ancient Rome to Technicolor-life. Hiring a star-studded cast, constructing endless sets and soundstages, employing thousands of extras, and commissioning more than 30,000 costumes, LeRoy wanted nothing more than to shock and awe audiences with the sheer scope and magnitude of his production. Sadly, LeRoy's spectacle comes at the expense of a more involving story.
Quo Vadis opens amidst the notorious reign of Nero (Peter Ustinov), a Roman emperor of the Julio-Claudian dynasty whose particularly extravagant and depraved rule brought about the persecution and execution of countless early Christians. But the tale itself focuses on one of Nero's veteran commanders, Marcus Vinicius (Robert Taylor), who has the debatable misfortune of falling in love with a religious upstart named Lygia (Deborah Kerr). As Nero succumbs to an increasing lust for power and the envious wiles of his wife (Patricia Laffan), he burns Rome, blames the newly emerging zealots in his empire, and begins sentencing every Christian his forces capture to death in the arena. Arrested and imprisoned for their faith and love, Marcus and Lygia have to face Nero's rage as readily as they embraced their relationship's humble beginnings.
Even though I've long been fascinated by the social, geopolitical, and cultural history of the Roman era, Quo Vadis didn't intrigue or engage my interests. While I knew I would have to endure the verbose deliveries and dated production values of '50s epic cinema, I was surprised to find myself growing so weary of Marcus and Lygia's love story. Maybe Titanic-techies felt the same while sitting through Kate and Leo's insipid Titanic heartstrings, but I longed for something meatier and more intense. I wanted LeRoy to dig into Nero's brain and show me an aspect of the madman I had never considered - a conflicted soul, a despondent ruler, a slipping mind. Anything other than a greedy opportunist - and, while Ustinov does make the most of every scene, the director continually returns to the dry, plodding romance at the heart of the tale. Don't get me wrong, students of history will find plenty of material to hold their attention, but they'll also have to wade through redundant dialogue, overwrought plot developments, and a wholly contrived third act that shrugs its shoulders and goes for broke. It doesn't help that Quo Vadis clocks in at 171 minutes; at least 55 of which I was glancing at my watch.
I'm sure there are cinephiles and historians out there who are more than willing to look past the film's shortcomings, but I'd much rather invest my time in more timeless classics like Warner's Gone with the Wind and Sony's recent release of (both spectacles in their own right that focus on character and story above all else). Even Spartacus, flawed as it is, manages to effectively mingle history with legend and deliver an exciting tale worthy of its stature. While LeRoy continually reminds viewers of the lush riches and breathtaking cityscapes of Rome, he neglects to infuse his production with any semblance of soul. Average at best and tiresome at worst, Quo Vadis offers more risk than reward and should be approached with caution.
Quo Vadis debuts on Blu-ray with a relatively impressive 1080p/VC-1 transfer (framed at 1.33:1) that rights the technical wrongs of Warner's recent DVD release. The film's newly-minted high definition palette is far more natural and attractive than its standard definition counterpart, featuring bold primaries, more realistic skintones, and deeper blacks. Delineation is also improved, showcasing slightly more shadow detail than ever before. Likewise, texture clarity and edge definition are sharper and more refined, leaving the presentation without any significant flaws (aside from the inherent limitations of its now-sixty-year-old source). Fleeting softness and print damage still pop up from time to time, but artifacting, noise, banding, and crush have been kept to a minimum. Lingering edge enhancement appears as well, but should go somewhat unnoticed by anyone watching the film on a screen smaller than 100 inches.
All things considered, it's a polished presentation that doesn't look artificial, overworked, or unfaithful to its roots. Quo Vadis doesn't quite offer the sort of masterful restoration rightfully granted to other notable Warner catalog releases ( and immediately spring to mind), but its video transfer should easily please fans of early '50s cinema and classic productions just the same. Purists like myself will probably appreciate Warner's Dolby Digital Mono presentation of the film's original audio - its crisp dialogue, authentic single-channel sonics, and nostalgic sensibilities are refreshing at times - but lossless junkies will frown at the studio's decision to forgo a 5.1 channel remix.
As you might expect, LFE support is non-existent, the rear speakers are silent, and the mono track doesn't produce any sort of soundfield whatsoever. Moreover, treble tones are often thin and tinny, the film's musical score is continually overshadowed by an overactive soundscape, and low-end thooms are occasionally shrill. On a positive note, I also didn't have any lofty expectations to shatter. The simple fact that I was listening to a mono presentation made it easier to sink into the film without evaluating how faithful the sound designers were to the film. Ultimately, had Warner provided both a lossless audio option and an original mono mix, Quo Vadis fans would have had the best of both worlds. However, I also think it would be disingenuous to criticize the disc's producers for sticking to the film's 1951 aesthetics and LeRoy's production. Despite a truncated selection of special features, the Blu-ray edition of Quo Vadis delivers a lot of information about the history of the film, the involvement of its cast and crew, the film's eventual reception, and its influence over the years.
Audio Commentary: Writer and industry historian F.X. Feeney sits down for an engaging chat in which he discusses the film's production woes, its lengthy development, and its impact on the genre. While he doesn't have enough time to pursue every subject he skims past, Feeney still does a fine job keeping his listeners on board. In the Beginning (SD, 44 minutes): A thorough, albeit complementary, glimpse behind-the-scenes that explains how Quo Vadis was largely responsible for the coming flood of Biblical Epics that would dominate Hollywood for the next ten years. I found myself nitpicking its arguments, but it was a solid documentary nonetheless. Theatrical Trailers (SD, 5 minutes).
Seeped in stirring history, based on the exploits of Nero's tyranny, and packed with marvelous Golden Age production values, Quo Vadis is a surprisingly dull 'classic' that probably won't win over many new followers. The Blu-ray edition is an improvement - offering an excellent video transfer and a faithful mono presentation of the film's original audio - but the lack of a lossless 5.1 remix and the presence of an anemic supplemental package will prevent this release from attracting curious masses. I suggest giving it a rent before considering a purchase.